Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37681824

RESUMO

This study aimed to compare the distribution of indoor, outdoor, and personal PM2.5 (particulate matter ≤ 2.5 µm) hourly concentrations measured simultaneously among 81 nonsmoking elderly participants (65 years or older) living in urban, industrial, or rural areas over 4 seasons (2 weeks per season) from November 2021 to July 2022). PM2.5 measurements were conducted using low-cost sensors with quality control and quality assurance tests. Seasonal outdoor PM2.5 levels were 16.4 (9.1-29.6) µg/m3, 20.5 (13.0-38.0) µg/m3, 18.2 (10.2-31.8) µg/m3, and 9.5 (3.8-18.7) µg/m3 for fall, winter, spring, and summer, respectively. For indoor PM2.5, the median seasonal range was 5.9-7.5 µg/m3, and the median personal PM2.5 exposure concentration was 8.0-9.4 µg/m3. This study provided seasonal distributions of IO (ratio of indoor to outdoor PM2.5 concentration) and PO (ratio of personal to outdoor PM2.5 concentration) using a total of 94,676 paired data points. The median seasonal IO ranged from 0.30 to 0.51 in fall, winter, and spring; its value of summer was 0.70. The median PO by season and study area were close to 1.0 in summer while it ranged 0.5 to 0.7 in other seasons, statistically significantly lower (p < 0.05) than that in summer. Our study has revealed that the real-world exposure level to PM2.5 among our elderly study participants might be lower than what was initially expected based on the outdoor data for most of the time. Further investigation may need to identify the reasons for the discrepancy, personal behavior patterns, and the effectiveness of any indoor air quality control system.


Assuntos
Hábitos , Indústrias , Idoso , Humanos , Estações do Ano , República da Coreia , Material Particulado
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...